SMT. BIMLA DUTT & SHRI HARI DEV DUTT PUBLIC WELFARE TRUST,LUDHIANA vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the interest of justice would be served by giving the assessee an opportunity to properly present its case and furnish necessary evidence to the CIT(E). The matter was restored to the CIT(E) for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust's application for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act was denied by the CIT(E). The denial was primarily based on donations received under CSR and the trust's alleged failure to furnish details of donations made to colleges.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of registration under Section 12A was justified without providing the assessee a proper opportunity to present its case and furnish evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee’s trust agitating the denial of registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide order dated 27.03.2019 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Patiala [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(E)’].
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, has submitted that the registration of the assessee trust u/s 12A of the Act has been
ITA No. 572-chd-2019 Smt. Bimla Dutt & Shri Hari Dev Dutt Public WelfareTurst, Ludhiana 2 denied by the Ld. CIT(E) mainly on the ground that the assessee had
received donations from ‘M/s Chanakya Diary Product Limited’ under
the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of the said concern. The Ld.
CIT(E) observed that the activities of the assessee trust were not
towards the charitable purposes. Further, that the assessee had not
furnished the details of the donations made by the assessee trust to
some colleges. The Ld. Counsel has submitted that, in fact, the Ld.
CIT(E) did not raise specific queries on this issue. That the assessee
trust is ready to furnish the necessary details to the Ld. CIT(E) and
apprise him of the activities of the assessee trust. That the assessee
trust may be given opportunity to properly present its case before the
Ld. CIT(E).
The Ld. DR on the other hand, has relied on the findings of the
Ld. CIT(E).
Considering the rival submissions, we are of the view, that the
interest of the justice will be well served if the assessee is given
opportunity to properly present its case before the Ld. CIT(E) and
furnish the necessary evidence. In view of this, the matter is restored to
the file of the CIT(E) for decision afresh. Needless to say that the Ld.
CIT(E) will give proper opportunity to the assessee trust to furnish
necessary details and evidences and then to examine the same and pass
ITA No. 572-chd-2019 Smt. Bimla Dutt & Shri Hari Dev Dutt Public WelfareTurst, Ludhiana 3 the order afresh on the application of the assessee in accordance with
law.
The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical
purposes
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 22.10.2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (संजय गग� / SANJAY GARG) (एन. के. सैनी / N.K. SAINI) उपा�य� /Vice President �या�यकसद�य/ Judicial Member Dated : 22.10.2019
आदेशक���त�ल�पअ�े�षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�त/ CIT 4. आयकरआयु�त (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. �वभागीय��त�न�ध, आयकरअपील�यआ�धकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड�फाईल/ Guard File
आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायकपंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026