No AI summary yet for this case.
आदेश/Order
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee, which is a Cooperative Group Housing Society, against the order dated 22.12.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Ludhiana [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] agitating confirmation of levy of penalty by the Assessing Officer u/s 271 (1)(c) of the Act.
The brief facts relating to the issue are that the assessee society is registered with the Registrar of Co-operative Societies. The
ITA No. 176/Chd/2019- The Bureaus Unique Co-op Group Housing Society ltd, Panchkula 2 assessee was allotted 8500 sq. meters of land by the HUDA. The cost
of the land was contributed by the 95 members of the assessee
society. Thereafter five storey building was constructed and flats
were accordingly allotted to the members of the society. In the return
of income for assessment year under consideration, the assessee
society claimed depreciation on the building considering itself as the
owner of the building. The Assessing Officer, however, rejected the
claim of the assessee society observing that neither the assessee
owned the flats nor it was doing any business or profession and even
it had not incurred any capital expenditure on the same. The
Assessing Officer, therefore, held that the assessee was not entitled
to any depreciation on the building and accordingly disallowed the
same. The Assessing Officer also initiated penalty proceedings u/s
271 (1)(c) of the Act and imposed the impugned penalty which has
been duly confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee, thus, has come in
appeal agitating the aforesaid levy of penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) of the
Act.
We have heard the rival contentions of the Ld. Authorized
Representatives of both the parties and have gone through the record.
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee
society under the bonafide belief and as advised by its Accountant,
claimed depreciation on building. There was no intention on the part
ITA No. 176/Chd/2019- The Bureaus Unique Co-op Group Housing Society ltd, Panchkula 3 of the assessee society to furnish inaccurate particulars of income or
to conceal its income. Even there was no attempt on the part of the
assessee to evade tax. That the assessee society was duly audited by
the Sub Inspector Audit, Cooperative Societies. The depreciation
claimed on the building was under bonafide belief and on the advise
of consultant accountant of the assessee society. That the assessee
society is not doing any business and there is no other source of
income except the contribution received from the members of the
society. Though the claim of depreciation has resulted into the claim
of losses but there are was no intention on the part of the assessee
society to set off these losses against any other income as the
assessee society is not in any activity of generation of income. That
subsequent to the denial of depreciation to the assessee society, the
assessee society in the subsequent years has revised entries relating
to the claim of depreciation. Even after reversing the entries in the
subsequent years, there is no taxable income of the assessee society.
That the assessee society should not be penalized for its bonafide
mistake.
On the other hand, Ld. DR has relied on the findings of the
lower authorities.
After considering the overall facts and circumstances of the
case and after considering the above submissions of the counsel for
ITA No. 176/Chd/2019- The Bureaus Unique Co-op Group Housing Society ltd, Panchkula 4 assessee, we are of the view, that in this case though the assessee
society mistakenly and, as suggested by its Consultant Accountant,
made a claim of depreciation on building which, in our view, was a
boanfide claim. There seems no attempt on the part of the assessee to
furnish inaccurate particulars of income or to conceal its income or
evade payment of income tax. In view of this, we do not find it a fit
case for levy of penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) of the Act.
The penalty levied by the lower authorities is accordingly
ordered to be deleted.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed.
Order dictated and pronounced in the Open Court immediately
on completion of hearing.
Sd/- Sd/-
(अ�नपूणा� गु�ता / ANNAPURNA GUPTA) (संजय गग� / SANJAY GARG) लेखा सद�य/ Accountant Member �या�यक सद�य/ Judicial Member Dated : 30.10.2019 “आर.के.”
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�त/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य आ�धकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File
ITA No. 176/Chd/2019- The Bureaus Unique Co-op Group Housing Society ltd, Panchkula
5 आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar