No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI MANISH BORAD
आदेश /O R D E R PER KUL BHARAT, J.M. : This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals), Ujjain, pertaining to assessment year 2006-07.
The assessee has taken following grounds of appeal :- 1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the addition of Rs. 5,93,217/- on account of credits in the name of farmers treating it to be bogus.
It was proved before the ld. AO and Ld. CIT(A) that the assessee has purchased goods through Mandi Committee from these farmers and has made the payment in the month of April, 2006. The addition of Rs. 5,93,217/- may please be deleted. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in maintaining the addition of Rs. 23,513/- on account of low household withdrawals. The same may please be deleted.
Apropos ground no.1, the brief facts are that the
assessee has shown the credit of Rs. 5,93,270/- from 42
persons. The credited amount shown was less than Rs.
20,000/-. Out of 42 persons, the assessee produced four
persons. The AO recorded the statement of four persons,
-: 3 :- Shri Ashok Kumar Tawli, Alirajpur viz., Shri Ram Singh Aman Singh, Shri Mansu Kanya, Shri
Ramaliya Kakadiya and Shri Mansukh Kaniya. The AO
found from the statement recorded that these persons were
not having any credit balance with the assessee. During
the course of appellate proceedings, the assessee filed new
evidences, which were forwarded to the AO for remand
report. The AO was asked specifically to check remaining
38 persons on the points of identity, creditworthiness and
genuineness. The assessee failed to produce these persons
before the AO on the appointed date. On appeal, the Ld.
CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Aggrieved by this, the
assessee is in appeal before us.
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that the
assessee is an individual doing the business of trading in
foodgrains, cereals and cotton. The assessee is a small
trader and the total sale is approximately Rs. 90 lacs. The
assessee purchases the goods from the farmers and
-: 4 :- Shri Ashok Kumar Tawli, Alirajpur traders. The payments are made within a short time.
Sometimes the payments are made within a period of 2 to 3
months. While framing the assessment, the AO observed
that the amounts payable at the end of the year for the
purchases made were Rs. 5,93,270/- from 42 persons. The
AO asked the assessee to produce four persons. The
assessee produced these persons and affidavits were also
filed. These persons were examined and everyone
confirmed the transactions of sale with the assessee. The
Ld. Counsel for the assessee further contended that in
appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) called for the remand report with a
direction to verify the identity, creditworthiness and the
genuineness of the transaction. In remand proceedings, the
AO asked the assessee to produce all the 38 persons and
handed over notices u/s 131 to the assessee. The assessee
requested vide letter dated 26.07.2015 to exempt the
personal presence of the farmers since they were from the
-: 5 :- Shri Ashok Kumar Tawli, Alirajpur Tribal area of Jhabua and were busy in agricultural
activities during that period and were not ready to come to
Ratlam. However, the assessee filed the khasra nakal
alongwith the affidavits of 35 farmers and submitted that
the payments to all of them were made during the short
period in next year. The AO did not find favour with the
submissions of the assessee and made the addition. The
Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the assessee’s appeal on the ground
that the assessee failed to discharge the burden of proof for
establishing the genuineness of the transaction. The Ld.
Counsel for the assessee further submitted that there was
no dispute that the purchases were made from the farmers
since the sales were effected during the year under
consideration and there was no much stock remaining with
the assessee except the stock of Tuwar of Rs. 2,53,872/-.
Under these circumstances, the small credits in the
accounts of the tribal farmers cannot be considered as
-: 6 :- Shri Ashok Kumar Tawli, Alirajpur non-genuine and no addition can be made. The Ld.
Counsel for the assessee prayed that the addition made
may please be deleted.
The Ld. Departmental Representative supported the
orders of the lower authorities .
We have considered the facts, rival submissions and
perused the material available on record. We have also
gone through the written submissions submitted by the
Ld. Counsel for the assessee, which is on record. We find
that the assessee is doing business in a small place which
is backward area in Jhabua District. We also find that the
purchases are made from the Tribal farmers who were
doing small farming. The amounts due are paid within a
short period of 15 days to 1 month. We find that the
assessee has filed the details of payments. The assessee
has also filed the papers regarding B-I and P-II Khasras
alongwith the affidavits in 35 cases. We find that the
-: 7 :- Shri Ashok Kumar Tawli, Alirajpur sufficient material was produced before the AO and four
persons were also produced before the AO. We find force in
the submission made by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee.
Under the above facts and circumstances, the small credits
in the accounts of the tribal farmers cannot be considered
as non-genuine. The addition made by the AO and
confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) at Rs. 5,93,217/- is hereby
deleted. Ground no. 1 is allowed.
Ground no. 2 relates to the addition of Rs. 23,513/-
made on account of low house hold withdrawals.
The assessee has withdrawn Rs. 30,483/- for house
hold withdrawals. The AO considered it low and made the
addition of Rs. 23,513/- , which the Ld. CIT(A) confirmed.
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that
there are only five members in his family. Assessee
submitted reply before the AO that his children are
studying in Government school and living in the house
-: 8 :- Shri Ashok Kumar Tawli, Alirajpur which is near to the School. There are no expenses of fee
and transportation. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee
contended that their standard of living is also general. The
amount withdrawn is sufficient in a small village.
The Ld. Departmental Representative supported the
orders of the lower authorities.
We have considered the facts, rival submissions and
perused the material available on record. We find force in
the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. We find
that the withdrawal of Rs. 30,483/- is sufficient and
reasonable. We, therefore, delete the addition of Rs.
23,513/- made by the AO and maintained by the Ld.
CIT(A). Ground no. 2 is allowed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is
allowed.
-: 9 :- Shri Ashok Kumar Tawli, Alirajpur
The order is pronounced in the open court on 11.05.2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (मनीष बोरड) (कुल भारत) लेखा सद�य �या�यक सद�य (MANISH BORAD) (KUL BHARAT) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Indore; �दनांक Dated : 11/05/2018 CPU/SPS Copy to: Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ITAT (DR)/Guard file. By order Private Secretary/DDO, Indore