No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM
आदेश / ORDER
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Pune dated 05-03-2018 for the assessment year 2014-15. The assessee in appeal has assailed the findings of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on solitary issue of confirming addition of Rs.2,87,910/- on account of disallowance of agricultural income.
ITA No.1098/PUN/2018, A.Y. 2014-15
Shri Deepak Sasar appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted
that the assessee in his return of income had disclosed agricultural income
of Rs.5,75,820/-. During scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing
Officer disallowed the said agricultural income and held the same to be
‘Income from Other Sources’. The ld. AR submitted that in First Appellate
Proceedings the assessee had furnished 7/12 extracts to show that the
assessee is having agricultural land. The ld. AR further pointed that in
7/12 extracts the details of crop cultivated on the land are clearly
mentioned. The assessee has cultivated rice on two parcels of land
comprising in Survey No. 365/1/A/1A and Survey No. 224/1. The
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) after considering the same
restricted the addition to Rs.2,87,910/- i.e. 50% of the agricultural income
disclosed by the assessee. The ld. AR submitted that the Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals) after considering the documentary evidence
furnished by the assessee indicating ownership of assessee on agricultural
land and cultivation of crop ought to have deleted entire addition.
Shri M.K. Verma representing the Department vehemently defended
the findings of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in confirming part
addition. The ld. DR submitted that the assessee failed to place on record
any documentary evidence before the Assessing Officer regarding
ownership of the land and cultivation of any crop. Before the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) the assessee only furnished 7/12
extracts to show the ownership. However, no documentary evidence was
placed before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to support the
sale of crop or expenditure incurred on cultivation of crops. The ld. DR
prayed for dismissing the appeal of assessee.
3 ITA No.1098/PUN/2018, A.Y. 2014-15
We have heard the submissions made by representatives of rival
sides and have perused the orders of authorities below. The 7/12 extracts
furnished by the assessee before the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) indicate that the assessee is having ownership of the agricultural
land and has also cultivated some crop (rice) on the said land. The ld. AR
of assessee has admitted the fact that there are no documentary evidence
with the assessee to show sale of rice or the expenditure incurred in the
form of seeds, pesticides etc. to support the expenditure incurred. In the
absence of any documentary evidence the Assessing Officer disallowed
entire income disclosed by the assessee as agricultural income and held
the same as ‘Income from Other Sources’. The Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals) after considering 7/12 extracts restricted the addition to 50%
of the total agricultural income declared by the assessee. Taking into
consideration entire facts we are of considered opinion that disallowance of
Rs.2,87,910/- is on the higher side. To meet the ends of justice we restrict
the disallowance to Rs.1,50,000/-. Thus, the assessee gets further relief of
Rs.1,37,910/-. Accordingly, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed in the
terms aforesaid.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed.
09th day of January, 2019. Order pronounced on Wednesday, the
Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (Vikas Awasthy) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे/ Pune; �दनांक/ Dated : 09th January, 2019 RK RK
4 ITA No.1098/PUN/2018, A.Y. 2014-15
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/ Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant. 1. 1. ��यथ�/ The Respondent. 2. आयकर आयु�त (अपील) / The CIT(A)-13, Pune 3. 4. The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Pune �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, “एक-सद�य मामला” ब�च, 5. पुणे/ DR, ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Pune. गाड� फ़ाइल/ Guard File. 6. //स�या�पत ��त// True Copy// //True Copy // आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
�नजी स�चव / Private Secretary, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, पुणे/ ITAT, Pune