M/S NARMADA JHABUA GRAMIN BANK,INDORE vs. DYPTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 3(1),INDORE, INDORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 549/IND/2017Status: DisposedITAT Indore12 October 2018AY 2014-155 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the deduction under Section 36(1)(vii)(a) is allowable only to the extent of the amount written off in the books of accounts. This decision followed a previous ruling by a co-ordinate bench on a similar issue.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Narmada Jhabua Gramin Bank, appealed against the disallowance of a claim made under Section 36(1)(vii)(a) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2014-15. The assessee argued entitlement to the deduction even without creating a reserve.

What were the issues?

Whether a deduction under Section 36(1)(vii)(a) is allowable even if no reserve is created. The quantification of deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) based on amounts written off.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 36(1)(vii)(a),Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI MANISH BORAD

For Appellant: Shri S.S. Deshpande,C.A Date of Hearing
For Respondent: Shri Lal Chand, CIT, Shri S.S. Deshpande,C.A Date of Hearing
Hearing: 11.10.2018Pronounced: 12.10.2018

PER MANISH BORAD, AM.

This appeal of Assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2014-15 is directed

against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-I,

Indore (in short ‘CIT(A)’), dated 22.05.2017 which is arising out of

the order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961(hereinafter called

as the ‘Act’) framed on 17.03.2016 by dcit-3(1), Indore.

2.

The assessee has raised following grounds; 1

Narmada Jhabua Gramin Bank ITA No.549/Ind/2017 “1. That Ld.CIT(A) has erred in maintaining the disallowance of the claim of the assessee made u/s 36(1)(vii)(a). 2. It was proved before the Ld.AO and the Ld.CIT(A) that the assessee is entitled to the deduction u/s 36(1)(vii)(a) even if no reserve is created. The assessee relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Southern Technologies Ltd. Vs CIT and the decision of the Bangalore Bench in the case of Syndicate Bank Vs. DCIT.”

3.

At the outset Learned Representative for the assessee

conceded to the fact that the issue raised in the instant appeal

stands already decided against the assessee by the Co-ordinate

Bench, Indore in the case of M/s. Narmada Malwa Grameen Bank

V/s ACIT 2(1), Indore M.A.No.104/Ind/202 (arising out I.T.A.

No.162/Ind/2011).

4.

Per contra Ld. Departmental Representative supported the

orders of lower authorities as well as the order of Tribunal in the

case of M/s. Narmada Malwa Grameen Bank V/s ACIT 2(1),

Indore.

5.

We have heard rival contentions and perused the records

placed before us. The assessee’s grievance is regarding the

disallowance of claim u/s 36(1)(vii)(a) of the Act. It is contended in

Narmada Jhabua Gramin Bank ITA No.549/Ind/2017 the grounds of appeal that the assessee is entitled to the deduction

u/s 36(1)(vii)(a) even if no reserve is created. We however find that

the same issue stands decided against the assessee’s appeal by the

Co-ordinate Bench in the case of M/s. Narmada Malwa Grameen

Bank V/s ACIT 2(1), Indore(supra) holding as follows that the

deduction u/s 36(1)(vii)(a) of the Act is to be allowed only to the

extent of amount written off in the books of accounts:-

“2. Through this petition it was contended by Learned A.R. that Tribunal has not decided the ground raised with respect to allowability of claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) of the I.T. Act, however, the matter has been restored to the file of the Assessing Officer to recomputed the claim of deduction to the extent of amount written off in the books of account though such write off was not partywise. 3. We have gone through the order of the Tribunal dated 29/03/2013 wherein the issue with regard of allowability of claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) of the Act was decided after discussing various decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as High Court in para 11 to 16, the issue with regard of quantification of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) was restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for recomputing the claim of deduction to the extent of amount written off in the books of account, even though such write off was not partywise. The contention of Learned A.R. was that full amount of provision for bad and doubtful debt should be allowed irrespective of

Narmada Jhabua Gramin Bank ITA No.549/Ind/2017 entry made in the books of account. We are not in agreement with the assessee’s contention in so far as provision contained in clause (viia) of section 36 clearly starts with the word ”in respect of provision for bad and doubtful debt made by schedule bank….” Thus, to the extent of provision made for bad and doubtful debts in the books of account, can be allowed. We do not find any mistake in the order of the Tribunal, which can be rectified u/s 254(2) of the Act. On the contrary, the Tribunal has given a favourable finding and direction to the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of deduction to the extent of amount written off in the books of account notwithstanding the fact that such write off was not partywise. This observation was made keeping in view the verdict of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vijaya Bank 323 ITR 166”.

6.

We therefore in the facts and circumstances of the case and

respectfully following the decision of Co-ordinate Bench dismiss the

grounds of appeal raised by the assessee.

7.

In the result the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

The order pronounced in the open Court on 12.10.2018.

Sd/- Sd/-

( KUL BHARAT) (MANISH BORAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �दनांक /Dated : 12 October, 2018 /Dev 4

Narmada Jhabua Gramin Bank ITA No.549/Ind/2017

Copy to: The Appellant/Respondent/CIT concerned/CIT(A) concerned/ DR, ITAT, Indore/Guard file. By order Asstt.Registrar,I.T.A.T., Indore

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →