No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 813/JP/2017
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 24.08.2017 of
ld. CIT (Exemptions), Jaipur passed under section 12AA(1)(b) of the I.T. Act. The
assessee has raised the following grounds :-
1.1 The order passed u/s 12AA(1)(b) is bad in law as well as on facts and hence, the same may please be quashed.
1.2 The ld. CIT (Exemptions) erred in law as well as facts of the present case in not providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard and the application may please be restored for reconsideration of application.
1.3 The ld. CIT (Exemptions) erred in law as well as on the facts of the present case in rejecting application seeking registration u/s 12AA.
2 ITA No. 813/JP/2017 Rajkiya Snatkotar Mahavidhyalay Vikas Samiti
The assessee is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act,
1958 and running educational institutions. The assessee filed an application in Form
No. 10A on 27.03.2017 for seeking registration u/s 12A(A) of the IT Act. The ld. CIT
(Exemptions) has rejected the application while passing the impugned order on the
ground that sufficient opportunity was provided to the assessee society/trust to
produce the details and documents but it had failed to do so.
Before us, the ld. A/R of the assessee has submitted that the ld. CIT (Exemptions) issued a letter dated 30th March, 2017 for submission of certain
documents/explanation which has been duly replied by the assessee by filing the
details and submissions. However, another letter dated 18.7.2017 as alleged in the
impugned order was never received by the assessee and, therefore, the assessee
was not given a proper opportunity of hearing before rejecting the application of the
assessee. He has produced Dak Register of the Society and submitted that the
assessee is maintaining all the records of the correspondence received and sent and
no such letter dated 18.07.2017 was received by the assessee. Hence, the ld. A/R
has submitted that there is a violation of principles of natural justice as the assessee
was not given an appropriate opportunity of hearing by the ld. CIT (Exemptions).
3.1. On the other hand, the ld. D/R has supported the impugned order of the ld.
CIT (Exemptions) and submitted that the assessee has failed to comply with the
requisite details and documents in support of its claim for registration under section
12AA despite the opportunity given by the ld. CIT (Exemptions).
Having considered the rival submissions as well as the relevant material on record, we note that subsequent to the filing of application dated 27th March, 2017,
3 ITA No. 813/JP/2017 Rajkiya Snatkotar Mahavidhyalay Vikas Samiti the ld. CIT (Exemptions) has issued a notice dated 30th March, 2017 asking the
assessee to submit certain documents/explanations as well as to produce original Trust Deed/ Memorandum of Association for verification on 1st May, 2017. In
compliance to the said notice, the representative of the assessee appeared before ld.
CIT (Exemptions) and filed written submissions. However, the ld. CIT (Exemptions)
noticed that complete details were not filed by the assessee and accordingly a second notice dated 18th July, 2017 was stated to have been issued to the assessee
asking to file the copy of accounts for last three years and activity details with
evidence etc. We further note that in para 4 of the impugned order the ld. CIT
(Exemptions) has stated that the assessee was again asked vide letter dated
18.7.2017 to produce the requisite record. Since no response or reply was filed by
the assessee, therefore, the application of the assessee was rejected by the ld. CIT
(exemptions) by observing in para 6 as under :-
“ 6. Sufficient opportunity was provided to the trust/society to produce details and documents in support of his claim for registration u/s 12AA of the I.T. Act, 1961 but trust/society had failed to do so. In the light of the above facts, it appears that the applicant trust/society is not interested in getting itself registered u/s 12AA of the I.T. Act. The application seeking registration u/s 12AA is hereby rejected and filed.”
We find that the assessee has produced the Dispatch and Receipt Registers wherein
the details of the letters dispatched and received were recorded on day to day basis.
However, no entry is found in the Receipt Register of letter dated 18.07.2017 as
stated in the impugned order. Since the ld. CIT (Exemptions) has rejected the
application for want of necessary documents/details, therefore, in the facts and
circumstances and in the interest of justice we set aside the matter to the record of
4 ITA No. 813/JP/2017 Rajkiya Snatkotar Mahavidhyalay Vikas Samiti
the ld. CIT (Exemption) for giving one more opportunity to the assessee to produce
the requisite record and documents. The ld. CIT (Exemptions) then decide the
matter afresh after considering relevant record to be filed by the assessee and giving
an opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 16/04/2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (foØe flag ;kno) (fot; iky jkWo ½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV ) (VIJAY PAL RAO) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member
Jaipur Dated:- 16/04/2018. Das/
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेषित@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू
The Appellant- Rajkiya Snatkotar Mahavidhyalay Vikas Samiti, Sujangarh. 2. The Respondent –The CIT (Exemptions), Jaipur. 3. The CIT(A). 4. The CIT, 5. The DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. Guard File (ITA No. 813/JP/2017) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत
5 ITA No. 813/JP/2017 Rajkiya Snatkotar Mahavidhyalay Vikas Samiti