M/S. NAMRATA CONSTRUCTION CO.,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal, and the Revenue did not object. The tribunal granted the prayer of the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2013-14. The appeal was filed with a delay of 15 days.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal after a delay in filing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
आदेश / ORDER
PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM:
The appeal filed by assessee is against the order of CIT(A)-12, Pune, dated 12.08.2016 relating to assessment year 2013-14 against order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153B(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
ITA No.2674/PUN/2016 2 M/s. Namrata Construction Co.
The present appeal has been filed after delay of 15 days and the assessee has filed petition for condonation in this regard. Further, the assessee has filed a letter dated 11.02.2019 seeking permission to withdraw the captioned appeal, for which learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue has not objected. Accordingly, the prayer of assessee is granted. Thus, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as having been ‘withdrawn’.
In the result, appeal of assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in open Court on this 11th day of February, 2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (ANIL CHATURVEDI) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) ऱेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्याययक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER ऩुणे / Pune; ददनाांक Dated : 11th February, 2019. GCVSR आदेश की प्रयतलऱपप अग्रेपषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent; आयकर आयुक्त(अऩीऱ) / The CIT(A)-12, Pune; 3. 4. The Pr.CIT-Central, Pune; ववबागीय प्रतततनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, ऩुणे “फी” / DR 5. ‘B’, ITAT, Pune; 6. गार्ड पाईऱ / Guard file. आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER, सत्यावऩत प्रतत //True Copy// वररष्ठ तनजी सधिव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण ,ऩुणे / ITAT, Pune
More judgments on Section 153B(1)(b)
- Praveen Kumar Saini, Jhunjhunu vs Income Tax Officer Ward-1, JhunjhunuITA 325/JPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Babi Saha Sha, Jalpaiguri vs DCIT, Circle 1(2), JalpaiguriITA 2448/KOL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Manoj Kumar Gupta, Jaipur vs ACIT, Central Circle 3, JaipurITA 1478/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs True Friend Management Support Services Pvt…ITA 3644/CHNY/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed29 May 2026AY 2021-22
- Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs True Friend Management Support Services Pvt…ITA 3643/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 May 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026