← Back to search

VIJAYKUMAR G J (HUF),BANGALORE vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1(2)(2), BENGALURU

PDF
ITA 2610/BANG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 February 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, BANGALORE

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN KAssessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Smt. Prathiba R, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Subramanian S, JCIT (DR)
Hearing: 17.02.2025Pronounced: 21.02.2025

PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

This appeal filed by the assessee is against the NFAC, Delhi order dated
19/12/2024
vide
DIN
No.
ITBA/NFAC/S/2024-
25/1071386872(1) for the assessment year 2013-14. 2. In the present appeal, the assessee has contended that it intends to settle the dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) Scheme 2024
introduced by the Government of India. Accordingly, during the course of the proceedings before us, the ld. Authorized Representative (AR) of the assessee submitted that the assessee is in the process of settling the Page 2 of 3

.
tax dispute in the appeal on hand and filed Form-2 as prescribed under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme (DTVSV), 2024, issued by the Competent Authority in support of his contention. Accordingly, the ld. AR filed the letter dated 17-02-2025 requesting for the withdrawal of appeal.

3.

The Learned Departmental Representative (DR) confirmed the submission of the AR and raised no objection to the dismissal of the appeal in light of the settlement of dispute under DTVSV, 2024. 4. Considering the submission of the parties and in view of the fact that Form-2 has been issued by the revenue authority, we find that no purpose would be served by keeping this appeal pending before the Tribunal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as the issue is being resolved under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. However, before parting it is clarified that in the event the Competent Authority under DTVSV, 2024, for any reason, deems the settlement to be non- operative or invalid, the Assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal by filing a suitable application for restoration of the appeal to its original number as per the provisions of law.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby dismissed under DTVSV 2024. Order pronounced in court on 21 day of February, 2025 (SOUNDARARAJAN K) Accountant Member Bangalore Dated, 21 February, 2025 Page 3 of 3

.
/ vms /

Copy to:

1.

The Applicant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 6. Guard file

By order

Asst.

VIJAYKUMAR G J (HUF),BANGALORE vs ACIT,CIRCLE-1(2)(2), BENGALURU | BharatTax