MAPLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(1)(1), BENGALURU, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal, noting that the conditions of the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme were met. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Ld.Addl/JCIT(A)-2. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and submitted a declaration. A certificate was issued under the scheme, deeming the appeal withdrawn.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal pending before the Tribunal can be withdrawn under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 upon issuance of a certificate by the designated authority.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
ORDER PER SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
This is an appeal filed by the assessee challenging the order of the Ld.Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Pune dated 12/11/2024 in respect of the A.Y. 2022-23.
When the appeal came up for hearing the assessee filed a letter dated 07/02/2025 which reads as under:
The assessee by way of their letter dated 07/02/2025 had requested for the withdrawal of the appeal pending before this Tribunal on the ground that the assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and also furnished the form-2 received from the department and Rs.4,36,883/ as directed by the department has already been paid on 07.02.2025 and therefore requested the Tribunal to permit the assessee to withdraw the said appeal.
The Ld.AR submitted the proofs for the payment and submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn.
We heard Ld D.R, who did not object to the prayer of the assessee. We have perused the said letter and the documents and recorded the same and dismiss the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Tribunal in case of any adverse has been passed by the authorities.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 24th February, 2025.
More judgments on Section 91
- Avinash Developers Private Limited, Raipur vs DCIT, Central Circle-1, RaipurITA 598/RPR/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Archana Gupta, New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3123/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Shishir Dhatwalia, Hamirpur vs Circle 1(1) Jalpaiguri, JalpaiguriITA 2583/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Chintaginjala Mallikarjuna Sivaprasad… vs ITO, Ward-1, AnantapurITA 839/HYD/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026