M/S GENERAL MOTORS TECHNICAL CENTRE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SPECIAL RANGE-3 , BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3345/BANG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 March 2025AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU (Accountant Member), SHRI KESHAV DUBEY (Judicial Member)5 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal noted that both parties had no objection to dismissing the appeal as withdrawn, with liberty to revive it if the dispute is not settled under DTVSVS. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSVS) and filed Form No.1. The case was adjourned pending the settlement of the dispute under DTVSVS.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, with liberty to revive the appeal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 92CA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY

For Appellant: Shri Yishu Goel, AR
For Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Hearing: 27.02.2025Pronounced: 17.03.2025

Per Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member

1.

This appeal is filed the assessee is arising out of the final assessment order passed by the AO u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] dated 29.10.2018 for the assessment year 2014-15.

2.

The ld. AR for the assessee submitted a letter dated 27.2.2025 along with Annexure which is the letter of request for rescheduling of hearing at a later date since the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSVS) and filed Form No.1 dated 30.1.2025 for the impugned AY 2014-15 (copy filed on record) and Form 2 is awaited from the competent authority. In view of the above, the assessee seeks rescheduling of the hearing.

3.

On the other hand the ld. CIT(DR) has filed written submission dated 26.2.2025 stating that the assessee has raised issue of limitation quoting the decision in the case of Shelf Drilling J T Angel Ltd. & Ors. And ROCA Bathroom Products (P) Ltd. and the matters are pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the above cases. It was further submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has directed that the case of Shelf Drilling J T Angel Ltd. & Ors. Cannot be cited as a precedent. It is further stated that until the Hon’ble Supreme Court decides the above matters and in order to avoid repeated litigation, the appeal may be adjourned.

4.

We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record. We note that the assessee has opted for DTVSV and filed Form No.1 of 30.1.2025 and Form 2 is awaited from the designated authority. Both the parties had no objection to dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn by the assessee in view of the assessee opting for DTVSVS, with liberty to revival of the appeal in case the dispute is not settled under DTVSVS. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee is at liberty to revive this appeal if the dispute is not settled under the DTVSVS.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn as above.

Pronounced in the open court on this 17th day of March, 2025.

More judgments on Section 92CA

All 3,978 judgments and leading authorities on Section 92CA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →