← Back to search

KEMPENAHALLY BYPANNA MANJUNATH ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2)(3), BANGALORE

PDF
ITA 2429/BANG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 March 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Shyanbhog, Advocate
For Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru.
Hearing: 19.03.2025Pronounced: 19.03.2025

Per Bench

These appeals of the assessee are arising out of the separate orders dated 15.10.2024 passed by the ld. CIT(Appeals), National
Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) relating to assessment years
2019-20 & 2020-21. 2. The ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 [VSVS] and ITA No.2428 & 2429/Bang/2024
Page 2 of 3

the Department has issued Form 2 and the assessee has to pay tax accordingly in both the cases. He submitted that once the tax is paid, assessee will seek for withdrawal of the appeals and requested for adjournment of the matters.
3. The ld. DR did not controvert the submissions of the ld. counsel for the assessee.
4. At the time of hearing, in view of Form 2 issued by the department, both the parties agreed to dismissal of the appeals as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revive the appeals in case the issue is not settled under VSVS. Accordingly, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. The assessee is at liberty to revive the appeals if the dispute is not settled under VSV Scheme.
5. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open court on this 19th day of March, 2025. ( KESHAV DUBEY)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Bangalore,
Dated, the 19th March, 2025. /Desai S Murthy /

ITA No.2428 & 2429/Bang/2024
Page 3 of 3

Copy to:

1.

Appellant 2. Respondent 3. Pr. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Bangalore.

By order

KEMPENAHALLY BYPANNA MANJUNATH ,BANGALORE vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2)(3), BANGALORE | BharatTax