SAMEERA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED,TIRUVALLUR vs. PR. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(3), BENGALURU

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2488/BANG/2024Status: HeardITAT Bangalore09 April 2025AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI WASEEM AHMED (Accountant Member), SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K. (Judicial Member)6 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal, condoning the delay of 217 days. The appeal was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal challenging an order passed by the PCIT under section 263 of the Act, but sought to withdraw the appeal due to the DCIT passing an order giving effect to the PCIT's order without making additions. The appeal was filed with a delay of 217 days.

What were the issues?

Whether to condone the delay in filing the appeal and allow the withdrawal of the appeal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 142(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.

For Respondent: Shri Aseem Sharma, CIT-DR

ORDER PER SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER

This is an appeal filed by the assessee challenging the order of the PCIT (Central), Bengaluru passed u/s. 263 of the Act in respect of the A.Y. 2018-19.

2.

The Ld.PCIT had issued a notice u/s. 263 to revise the order of the AO dated 24/05/2021 and the Ld.PCIT had passed an order directing the assessing officer to consider the two loan creditors since the assessee had not filed the details. As against the said order, the assessee filed this appeal before this Tribunal with a delay of 217 days.

3.

The assessee had explained that the delay has been occurred since the assessee was under the impression that the AO would verify the two loan creditors only and therefore they have not filed any appeal challenging the section 263 order passed by the Ld.PCIT. But the AO pursuant to the section 263 order, had issued a notice u/s. 142(1) in which he sought for the details for all the aspects and even beyond the concerned assessment year, and therefore the tax consultant advised the assessee to file an appeal before the Tribunal by challenging the section 263 order of the PCIT. Therefore the delay of 217 days was occurred which is neither wilful nor wanted but due to the bonafide reasons as stated above and prayed to condone the said delay.

Tribunal, the assessee filed a petition dated 05/03/2025 requesting the Tribunal to allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal since the DCIT, Central Circle 3 (1), Bengaluru had passed an order on 17/02/2025 giving effect to the order of the PCIT and no additions were made. In such circumstances, the assessee sought for the permission of the Tribunal to withdraw the main appeal itself.

5.

We have considered the said facts in detail and we are permitting the assessee to withdraw the appeal by condoning the said delay of 217 days in filing the appeal.

6.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 09th April, 2025.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →