SHRI BHUVANESHWARI AMMANAVARU SHRI BHUVANESHWARI DEVALAYA TRUST,BHAVANAGIRI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 13/BANG/2025Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 April 2025AY 2024-25Bench: SHRI. LAXMI PRASAD SAHU (Accountant Member), SHRI. KESHAV DUBEY (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the CIT(E) passed the order rejecting the application after the assessee had submitted documents, and that the CIT(E)'s observation that the assessee was non-responsive was incorrect. Therefore, the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the rejection of its registration application by the learned CIT(E). The CIT(E) rejected the application observing that the assessee had not provided requisite details and failed to appear. The assessee contended that it had complied with notices and provided all required documents.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration application without considering the documents submitted by the assessee and whether the assessee was given adequate opportunity.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI. LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI. KESHAV DUBEY

For Appellant: Shri. Madhu H. S, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri. Rajashekhar M, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Hearing: 03.04.2025Pronounced: 07.04.2025

Per Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member :

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the rejection of registration order passed by the learned CIT(E) vide Order dated 06.11.2024, DIN and Notice No.ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1070145089(1).

2.

The learned AR of the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the learned CIT(E) and he submitted that assessee has complied with the notices and submitted that after filing of documents, met the concerned Officer to enquire if any further documents are required and further details were also given as was required. After providing entire details, the rejection order was Page 2 of 3 passed by the learned CIT(E) observing that assessee has not provided the requisite details and subsequently rejected the application filed by the assessee. Asseessee received information on 25.09.2024.asking to submit the necessary documents by 10.10.2024 filed on 16.10.2024 to process the application for registration in Form 10AB for the relevant block periods. In this regard, assessee replied to notice. Assessee filed reply on 21.10.2024 attaching the entire details. However, the learned CIT(E) has not taken note of the submissions made by the assessee. Alsoassessee has filed reply on ……. and he requested that the matter may be sent back to the learned CIT(E) for a fresh consideration along with the documents filed as required by the learned CIT(E) that were filed earlier.

3.

On the other hand, the learned DR relied on the Order of the learned CIT(E) and fairly accepted that the matter should be examined afresh considering the documents submitted by the assessee.

4.

Considering the rival submissions, we noted that on 09.10.2024 assessee has submitted various documents containing Sl. Nos.1 to 5 vide acknowledgment No.376520060300524 which is placed on record. The learned CIT(E) has passed Order on 06.11.2024 which is much after the submission of the documents. However, the learned CIT(E) has observed in para No.4 that the notice was issued but the assessee failed to appear before him and did not file necessary documents / details as required under section 12AA of the Act and application in Form 10AB dated 30.05.2024 has been rejected. He also noted that JAO had issued letters / notices on 25.09.2024 and 14.10.2024. He has observed that assessee was non-responsive and wrongly noted that the assessee has not responded till the date of Order. Therefore, considering the prayer of the learned Counsel and taking into account the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, we remit this issue back to the CIT(E) for a fresh consideration.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Pronounced in the court on the date mentioned on the caption page.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →