SANTOSH NAIK,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, MANDYA

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the NFAC, Delhi dated 09/12/2024 vide DIN No. ITBA/NFAC/S/ 250/2024-25/1071021551(1) for the assessment year 2018-19.

At the outset, it is observed that the assessee neither appeared before the Assessing Officer (AO) during the assessment proceedings nor before the Ld. CIT(A) during the appellate stage. Consequently, both the assessment and the first appellate order were passed ex parte.

Before us, the Ld. Authorised Representative (AR) submitted that the non-appearance before the Ld. CIT(A) was due to the fact that the notices issued by NFAC were inadvertently delivered in the spam folder of the assessee’s email account and thus remained unnoticed. It was contended that this was the sole reason for non-compliance, and the assessee may be granted another opportunity to present its case on merits. The Ld. AR also undertook the responsibility for the necessary compliance and ensure due cooperation during the proceedings. It was further submitted that since the assessment is the exparte order, the matter may be remanded back to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. This request was made to ensure proper opportunity of being heard is provided in accordance with the principles of natural justice.

On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) did not raise any objection to the request of the assessee for setting aside the matter to the file of the AO for de novo adjudication as per law.