SANTOSH NAIK,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, MANDYA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee's inability to appear before the CIT(A) was due to bona-fide reasons and set aside the order. The matter was restored to the AO for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to appear before the Assessing Officer (AO) and the CIT(A), leading to ex-parte assessment and appellate orders. The assessee's AR claimed non-appearance was due to notices being delivered to the spam folder.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case on merits due to non-appearance caused by technical reasons?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV
PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the NFAC, Delhi dated 09/12/2024 vide DIN No. ITBA/NFAC/S/ 250/2024-25/1071021551(1) for the assessment year 2018-19.
At the outset, it is observed that the assessee neither appeared before the Assessing Officer (AO) during the assessment proceedings nor before the Ld. CIT(A) during the appellate stage. Consequently, both the assessment and the first appellate order were passed ex parte.
Before us, the Ld. Authorised Representative (AR) submitted that the non-appearance before the Ld. CIT(A) was due to the fact that the notices issued by NFAC were inadvertently delivered in the spam folder of the assessee’s email account and thus remained unnoticed. It was contended that this was the sole reason for non-compliance, and the assessee may be granted another opportunity to present its case on merits. The Ld. AR also undertook the responsibility for the necessary compliance and ensure due cooperation during the proceedings. It was further submitted that since the assessment is the exparte order, the matter may be remanded back to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. This request was made to ensure proper opportunity of being heard is provided in accordance with the principles of natural justice.
On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) did not raise any objection to the request of the assessee for setting aside the matter to the file of the AO for de novo adjudication as per law.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. In the interest of substantial justice, and considering that the assessee was unable to appear before the ld. CIT-A due to bona-fide reasons as claimed, we find it appropriate to set aside the matter to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. The assessee is directed to fully cooperate in the proceedings and not seek undue adjournments. Accordingly, the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is set . aside and the matter is restored to the file of the AO to decide the issue afresh, after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026