RAJASHEKAR YEGAVAKOTE LAXMINARASAPPA,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(3)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per the DTVSV Scheme, appeals pending before ITAT are deemed withdrawn upon issuance of the certificate. Since Form-2 (Certificate u/s 92(1) of the Finance Act, 2024) was issued, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Mumbai for AY 2015-16. The assessee did not appear before the Tribunal but submitted a letter indicating they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and Form-2 had been issued.
What were the issues?
Whether the pending appeal is to be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and a certificate being issued.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 91(2),Section 92(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Mumbai dated 30/07/2024 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1067154474(1) for the assessment year 2015-16 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”).
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, on going through the record, we find a letter dated 26.12.2024 filed on 27.12.2024 for the assessment year 2015-16 wherein it is submitted that the assessee has filed the Form 1 DTVSV 2024 for Rajashekar Yegavakote Laxminarasapp
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92(1)
- Vodafone West Limited, (Formerly Known As… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-4(1)(2), AhmedabadITA 671/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: Disposed11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
- The Dy CIT, Circle-4(1)(2), Ahmedabad vs Vodafone West Limited, AhmedabadITA 1634/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: Disposed11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
- 3M India Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT, BangaloreITA 168/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2025AY 2011-12
- Quintiles Inc., Mumbai vs DCIT (It) Cir 3(3)(1), MumbaiITA 728/MUM/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2025AY 2013-14
- Quintiles Inc., Mumbai vs DCIT (Intl. Tax) Range 3(3)(1), MumbaiITA 2104/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2025AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026