EESWARA SEVA SAMITHI,DAVANAGERE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION, EXEMPTION WARD-1, HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT noted that eligibility for Section 80G(5) approval is contingent upon the assessee first obtaining registration under Section 12AB, an appeal for which is pending. Therefore, the Tribunal restored the Section 80G(5) appeal to the CIT(E) for re-adjudication after the Section 12AB matter is decided, granting the assessee an opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Eeswara Seva Samithi, applied for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, which the CIT(E) rejected. The rejection was based on the assessee's failure to incur substantial expenditure towards its trust objectives or commence activities, despite receiving significant donations and corpus funds with only minor expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for approval under Section 80G(5) when its registration application under Section 12AB is pending decision before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
Per Prashant Maharishi, Vice President
This appeal is filed by Eeswara Seva Samithi (the assessee/appellant) for the assessment year 2025-26 against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemptions, [ld. CIT(E)] dated 27.12.2024 wherein the application of the assessee in Form 10AB for recognition u/s. 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] was rejected.
The brief facts of the case show that assessee filed application in Form 10AB on 30.6.2024 for approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Act. On examination of the details, the ld. CIT(E) found that assessee has not made any substantial expenditure towards the object of the trust and assessee has also not commenced its activities of attainment of the objects. It was noted that assessee has received donation of Rs.4,78,63,616 for the year ended on 31.3.2024, but as per Income & Expenditure account for 31.3.2024, has incurred only the expenditure of audit fees of Rs.15,000. Further, upto 31.3.2024 assessee has received corpus donation of Rs.50 lakhs, but has incurred expenditure of only 25,000 as audit fees and Rs.20,000 as consultation fee. Therefore the ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application of the assessee,
The assessee is in appeal before us.
The ld. AR filed a paperbook containing 130 pages and submitted that assessee has submitted all the details about the activities of the trust. He referred to its reply placed at pages 14 to 129 of the PB. He further submitted that appeal of the assessee against not granting registration u/s. 12AB of the Act in is already heard and order is awaited. The judgment of that appeal will decide the fate of recognition u/s. 80G(5) to the assessee. Therefore, the ld. CIT(E) may be directed to decide this issue after decision in that appeal.
The ld. CIT(DR) supported the order of the ld. CIT(E) and stated that when the assessee has not commenced any activity, there is no purpose in granting recognition to the assessee trust u/s. 80G(5) of the Act.
We have considered the rival contentions and perused the order of the ld. CIT(E) rejecting the application for registration u/s. 80G(5) of the Act to the assessee. It was also pointed out that in the assessee’s registration u/s. 12AB of the Act was also challenged before the ITAT. The appeal of the assessee is heard and order is awaited. If the assessee trust gets registration u/s. 12AB of the Act, naturally thereafter only the assessee can get the approval u/s. 80G(5) of the Act. If the assessee fails to get registration u/s. 12AB of the Act, there is no question of grant recognition u/s. 80G(5) of the Act. As the issue of granting registration u/s. 12AB to the assessee has not been decided yet, in the interest of justice, we restore this appeal back to the file of CIT(Exemptions) to decide after the issue of registration u/s. 12AB is decided, in accordance with law and after granting assessee an opportunity of hearing.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026