COFFEEDAY HOTELS & RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per the DTVSV Scheme, 2024, appeals pending before ITAT are deemed withdrawn upon issuance of the settlement certificate. Since all formalities were completed by the assessee, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted to settle tax disputes under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. The assessee filed necessary forms and was issued a certificate for settlement of tax arrears. The AR requested withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee's settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and the relevant provisions of the scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 91(2),Section 92(1),Section 92(2),Section 93
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1073586386(1) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised 4 grounds of appeal.
At the outset, the ld. A.R. for the assessee drawn our attention to a letter dated 19.5.2025 wherein it is submitted that the assessee had opted to settle the case of quantum assessment under VSVS, 2024 and accordingly filed the Form 1 DTVSV 2024 for the settlement of the disputes under the Dire
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92(1)
- Vodafone West Limited, (Formerly Known As… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-4(1)(2), AhmedabadITA 671/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: Disposed11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
- The Dy CIT, Circle-4(1)(2), Ahmedabad vs Vodafone West Limited, AhmedabadITA 1634/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: Disposed11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
- 3M India Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT, BangaloreITA 168/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2025AY 2011-12
- Quintiles Inc., Mumbai vs DCIT (It) Cir 3(3)(1), MumbaiITA 728/MUM/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2025AY 2013-14
- Quintiles Inc., Mumbai vs DCIT (Intl. Tax) Range 3(3)(1), MumbaiITA 2104/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2025AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026