← Back to search

NORTH EAST NE BITUMEN,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

PDF
ITA 257/GTY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 March 20263 pages

Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VP & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM

For Appellant: Shri Ramesh Goenka, AR
For Respondent: Shri Santosh Kumar karnani, DR
Hearing: 09.03.2026Pronounced: 13.03.2026

PER BENCH: These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT (A)”] dated 17.02.2025 for the AY 2021-22. The penalties were levied u/s 271AAD & 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred as „the Act‟) vide order dated 23.06.2023 & 27.06.2023. 2. The ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset stated that the documents / books of accounts of the assessee were seized by DGGI, Shillong Regional Unit, Meghalaya and therefore the same could not be furnished by the assessee before the ld. AO as well as before the ld. CIT (A). The ld. Counsel for the assessee prayed before the bench that since the books of accounts/records were released by the DGGI ITA Nos. 256 to 258/GTY/2025 North East NE Bitumen; AY 2021-22

Assam, one opportunity may be given to the assessee, so that the assessee can produce these documents before the authorities below which are now in possession of assessee.
3. The ld. DR on the other hand, fairly considered that the assessee had not produced the documents/ books of account before the authorities below as these were seized by the service tax authorities.
4. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the books of accounts/ documents were seized by the service tax authorities and consequently could not be produced before the ld. AO as well as before the ld. CIT (A) and the orders were passed without taking into account the records/books of accounts. Therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play, we are inclined to restore these cases to the file of the ld.
AO so that these books of accounts along with documents could be examined by the authorities and case can be decided denovo after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Therefore, we restore the appeal to the file of AO with the above directions.
5. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 13.03.2026. (RAJESH KUMAR)
(DUVVURU RL REDDY)
(ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)
(VICE PRESIDENT)

Guwahati, Dated: 13.03.2026
Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS
ITA Nos. 256 to 258/GTY/2025
North East NE Bitumen; AY 2021-22

Copy of the Order forwarded to:

BY ORDER,//

Sr. Private Secretary/ Asst.