BOSCH GLOBAL SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not passed a speaking order while rejecting the petition for condonation of delay. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to pass a speaking order on the condonation of delay petition and then decide the matter.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was arising from the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2018-19. The appeal was disposed of without condoning the delay. The assessee contended that the delay was due to the Covid-19 period and should have been condoned.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) ought to have passed a speaking order for condonation of delay before deciding the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV
PER PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of ld. CIT(A) dated 5.11.2024 vide DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1070110653(1) and relates to assessment year 2018-19 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”).
At the outset, we observe that the ld. CIT(A) has disposed of the appeal of the assessee without condoning the delay.
Ld. Counsel for the assessee appearing on behalf of the assessee pointed out that the reasons for the delay were duly mentioned in column no.15 of form 36, as per which the delay was Bosch Global Software Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Page 2 of 2 pertaining to Covid-19 period and hence the ld. CIT(A) ought to have condoned the delay and then could have decided the matter.
Ld. D.R. relied upon the orders of authorities below.
After considering the rival submissions, we are of the view that the matter requires fresh consideration at the end of ld. CIT(A). As the Ld. CIT(A) has not passed a speaking order while rejecting the petition for condonation of delay. Therefore, we direct the ld. CIT(A) to pass a speaking order with respect to the petition for condonation of delay and then decide the matter in accordance with law.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19th June, 2025
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026