M/S NTT DATA GLOBAL DELIVERY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SPECIAL RANGE-5 , BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's submission that the issue was settled under MAP and the subsequent filing of a withdrawal application. The Revenue's counsel had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order challenging an addition of Rs. 1,077,937,987/-. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel submitted that the issue was settled under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) and filed a withdrawal application.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn as the issue has been settled under MAP.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI. LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI. SOUNDARARAJAN K
ORDER Per Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member :
This appeal filed by the assessee against the final assessment order passed by the AO on25.10.2018 challenging the addition of Rs.1,077,937,987/-.
At the outset of hearing, the learned Counsel submitted that the issue raised by the Revenue authorities has been settled under MAP and he has filed withdrawal application vide letter dated 04.06.2025 before the Registry, which is as under:
IT(TP)A No.3420/Bang/2018 Page 2 of 8 IT(TP)A No.3420/Bang/2018 Page 3 of 8 IT(TP)A No.3420/Bang/2018 Page 4 of 8 IT(TP)A No.3420/Bang/2018 Page 5 of 8 IT(TP)A No.3420/Bang/2018 Page 6 of 8 IT(TP)A No.3420/Bang/2018 Page 7 of 8
Learned DR has no objection for withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee.
Considering the above application filed by the assessee, we permit to withdraw the appeal of the assessee. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
IT(TP)A No.3420/Bang/2018 Page 8 of 8 5. In result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026