← Back to search

DINKU MUKANDLAL SHAH ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 24(1)(1), MUMBAI

PDF
ITA 1448/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 March 20263 pages

Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VP & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM Dinku Mukandlal Shah 7 Phulwadi, Lallubhai Park, Andheri Railway Station S.O., Andheri (W), Mumbai-400 058 Vs. ITO-24(1)(1) Piramal Chamber, Mumbai

For Appellant: None
For Respondent: Shri Bhagirath Ramawat, Sr. DR
Hearing: 13.03.2026Pronounced: 13.03.2026

Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, AM:

This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 18.12.2025 of first appellate authority, pertaining to assessment year (A.Y.) 2019-20. 2. The assessee has filed application dated 06.03.2026, seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. The contents of the said letter are as under:

SUB: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL

With reference to above, I had filed an appeal against the order passed u/s 250 of Income Tax Act,
1961 dated 18.12.2025 for AY 2019-20 before the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was initially filed electronically on 06.02.2026 (Appeal No: 1364/Mumbai/2026).

Subsequently, the following documents were submitted physically on 10.02.2026 in connection with the same appeal-

1.

Form 36 (in triplicate). 2. Grounds of Appeal (in triplicate). 2 3. Acknowledgement for the ITAT appeal filed online (in triplicate). 4. Copy of order of CIT (Appeals) in triplicate (including certified).

2
5. Copy of Assessment Order u/s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in triplicate (including certified).
6. Form 35 along with Grounds of appeal and statement of facts filed before first appellate authority (in triplicate).
7. Tribunal filing fee challan of Rs. 10,000/- (in triplicate). 7
8. Original Letter of Authority.

Following are the details of the Appeal filed for AY 2019-20

Sr. No Assessment Year
Appeal No Date of Filing
Mode
1
AY 2019-20
1364/Mumbai/2026
06.02.2026
Electronically
2
AY 2019-20
1448/Mumbai/2026
10.02.2026
Physically

I would like to inform you that submissions mentioned above belong to the same appeal;however they are treated as two separate appeals by the Tribunal.

in order to avoid duplication of proceedings, I hereby request you to withdraw the appeal filed physically on 10.02.2026 (Appeal No: 1448/Mumbai/2026), while the electronically filed appeal bearing Appeal No. 1364/Mumbai/2026 may kindly be retained on record.

Kindly consider the request for withdrawal and oblige.

I trust you will find the request to withdraw in order.

Thanking you,

Yours Faithfully,

3.

The learned Departmental Representative (ld. DR for short) has no objection to the assessee’s prayer.

4.

In view of the aforesaid, we are inclined to permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 13.03.2026 (Saktijit Dey) (Makarand V. Mahadeokar) Vice President

Accountant Member

Mumbai; Dated : 13.03.2026
Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT(A) 4. CIT - concerned 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard File BY ORDER,

(Dy./Asstt.

DINKU MUKANDLAL SHAH ,MUMBAI vs ITO WARD 24(1)(1), MUMBAI | BharatTax