DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-32, DELHI, DELHI vs. BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were initiated beyond the limitation period and on a mere change of opinion without tangible material. The issue of validity of reopening was covered in favor of the assessee by previous decisions of coordinate benches.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a revised return declaring Nil income. The Assessing Officer (AO) later issued a notice u/s 148 for reassessment for AY 2009-10, making additions for disallowance of depreciation, capitalization of personnel cost, and revised book profit. The CIT(A) allowed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO were valid, considering the limitations and lack of tangible material, and if the CIT(A) correctly quashed the reopening.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 139(1),Section 148,Section 115JB(2),Section 149
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. R.B. Wadkar695 citing268 ITR 332 · 2004 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI
PER VIMAL KUMAR, JM:
The appeal filed by the Revenue is against order dated 23.05.2025 of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] arising out of assessment order dated 20.12.2016 of Ld. Assessing Officer/DCIT, Circle-5(1), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Ld. AO’ ) u/s 147/143(3) of the Act for Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. Brief facts of the case are that original return of income was filed by assessee on 29.09.2009 u/s 139(1) of the Act after adjusting brought forward losses of DCIT vs. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026