GURGAON ONE RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION,GURGAON vs. ITO-WARD 1(5),GURGAON, GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the interest expenditure incurred by the assessee was directly related to earning the interest income and was allowable as a deduction under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal followed its own prior decisions on similar matters.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Resident Welfare Association, claimed a deduction for interest distributed to its members from interest earned on bank deposits. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction, and the CIT(A) confirmed the addition. The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether interest distributed by a Resident Welfare Association to its members from interest earned on bank deposits is an allowable deduction under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT1,842 citing284 ITR 323 · 2006 · SC
- (i) Arjun Rishi v. ITO3 citing176 Taxmann.com 720 · 2025 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR
PER VIMAL KUMAR, JM: The appeals filed by the Assessee are against orders dated 13.06.2025 of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] arising out of assessment orders dated 28.12.2018 and 13.11.2019 of Ld. Assessing Officer, Ward-1(5), Gurgaon for Assessment Years 2016-17 & 2017-18 respectively.
Therefore, these appeals were taken up together and heard. All are being disposed off by th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 57
- Dattatraya Prakash Wankar, Solapur vs ITO WD-2(3), SolapurITA 2210/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Aurelia Housing Coperative Society Ltd… vs I.T.O., Ward - 49(4), KolkataITA 2198/KOL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Ramkrishna Bajaj Charitable Trust, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 66/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Zidni Ilma Charitable Trust, Vadodara vs The ITO, Ward-Exemp, VadodaraITA 914/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Zidni Ilma Charitable Trust, Vadodara vs The ITO, Ward-Exemp, VadodaraITA 913/AHD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026