SRI. GURAPPA JAYARAM REDDY(AOP),BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BANGALORE
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PERBENCH:
These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC both dated 28.11.2024
passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) vide
DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1070733939(1) for the A.Y. 2018-19 and DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-
25/1070734090(1) for the A.Y. 2020-21. 2. The assessee has raised various grounds of appeal in both these appeals.
3. At the outset, the Ld.Authorized Representative of the assessee drew our attention toan e-Mail dated 14.07.2025 in which the Ld.AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee is availing the benefit of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and also ITA Nos.67 & 68/Bang/2025
Sri Gurappa Jayaram Reddy (AOP)
Page 2 of 3
submitted the Form No. 3 and accordingly requested to allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal in ITA No. 67/Bang/2025 filed for the assessment year 2018-19. 4. Further, the Ld.AR of the assessee also drew our attention to another e-mail dated 14.07.2025 with regard to A.Y. 2020-21 in which the Ld.AR submitted that the assessee is also availing the benefit of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and has already filed an application. However, the assessee is awaiting
Form No. 2. 5. This being so, we accordingly at the request of the Ld.AR of the assessee dismiss both these appeals of the assessee as withdrawn with a liberty to reinstate the appeals if the assessee’s applications under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
are not accepted.
6. In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 31st July, 2025 (Waseem Ahmed)
Accountant Member (Keshav Dubey)
JudicialMember
Bangalore,
Dated:31st July, 2025. Giridhar/Sr.PS
ITA Nos.67 & 68/Bang/2025
Sri Gurappa Jayaram Reddy (AOP)
Page 3 of 3
Copy to:
1. The Applicant
2. The Respondent
3. The CIT
4. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore.
5
Guard file
By order
Asst.