MRS. SAROJA ,BENGALURU vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, BENGALURU-2, BENGALURU

Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed her return of income for the AY 2015-16 on 06-10-2015 declaring total income of Rs.2,11,90,349/-. The case was subsequently taken up for scrutiny and the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s.144B of the Act for AY 2015-16 was completed on 25-03-2022 by accepting the returned income. 3.1 Thereafter the ld. PCIT Bengaluru-2 had set aside the order of AO passed on 25.3.2022 u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act by holding that the order is erroneous insofar as it is prejudicial to the interest Mrs. Saroja, Bangalore Page 5 of 5 of the revenue in terms of section 263 of the Act & directed the AO to make fresh assessment in accordance with law. 4. Aggrieved by the Order passed u/s 263 of the Act, the assessee has filed the present appeal before this Tribunal.

Before us, at the outset, the ld. Authorized Representative of the assessee requested to withdraw this appeal as the consequential assessment order as per the direction of the Ld. PCIT has already been passed. The ld. DR also expressed no objection if we permit the assessee to withdraw his appeal. Thus, as per the request of the Ld.AR of the assessee, we dismiss this appeal as withdrawn.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

The Applicant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 5 Guard file