SHRI. JAYADEVA MURUGHARAJENDRA PATHTHINA SAHAKARA SANGHA NI HOSADURGA ,CHITRADURGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, CHITRADURGA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1193/BANG/2025Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 August 2025AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY (Judicial Member), SHRI WASEEM AHMED (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Ld. Commissioner for a fresh decision, emphasizing that the assessee must be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard and must comply with future notices and submissions.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to comply with opportunities provided by the Assessing Officer and the Ld. Commissioner. The Ld. Commissioner upheld additions made by the AO, including Rs. 38,83,000/- for unexplained cash credit and Rs. 6,70,512/- for disallowance of provisions and expenditure.

What were the issues?

Whether the Ld. Commissioner was justified in upholding additions without proper adjudication due to the assessee's non-compliance, and if the matter should be remanded for a fresh decision with due opportunity.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250,Section 68,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH “SMC”, BANGALORE

Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI WASEEM AHMED

Hearing: 14.08.2025Pronounced: 14.08.2025

Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:

This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 28.03.2025, impugned herein, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC)/ Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short Ld. Commissioner) u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2017-18.

Mr. Jayadeva Murugharajendra Paththina Sahakara Sangha Ni Hosadurga 2. In the instant case, admittedly in the appellate proceedings before the Ld. Commissioner, against the additions of Rs.38,83,000/- being unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act and Rs.6,70,512/- on account of disallowance qua provisions and expenditure, as made by the Assessing Officer (AO) vide assessment order dated 23.12.2019 u/s 143(3) of the Act, the Assessee despite of affording various opportunities made no compliance. Therefore, in the constrained circumstances, the Ld. Commissioner affirmed the aforesaid additions by dismissing the appeal of the Assessee. Though the Assessee due to non- compliance made before the Ld. Commissioner, is not entitled for any leniency however, it is a fact that in the absence of relevant submissions and documents, the issues involved in the appeal before the Ld. Commissioner also remained to be adjudicated in its right perspective and proper manner. Thus, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances in totality, for just and proper decision of the case, equitable relief, fair play and substantial justice, we are inclined to remand the instant case to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision afresh by affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the Assessee, however, subject to deposit of Rs. 11,000/- in the Revenue Department under “other heads” within 30 days of the order.

3.

We also deem it appropriate to direct the Assessee to comply with the notices to be issued by the Ld. Commissioner and file the relevant submissions and documents as would be essentially required for proper and just decision of the case. We also clarify that in case of subsequent default, the Assessee shall not be entitled for any leniency.

4.

Thus, the case is remanded to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision afresh accordingly.

5.

In the result, the Assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 14.08.2025.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →