SRI. KRISHNA SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged that the CPC incorrectly processed the return under the new regime despite the assessee's clear indication otherwise. The issue was remitted back to the JAO for reconsideration and to grant benefits under the old tax regime after verification and providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed its return of income declaring income under the old regime and indicating 'No' for opting under sections 115BAA/115BAB. However, the CPC processed the return under the new regime, denying benefits of the old regime and raising a demand. The assessee had not filed Form 10IC.
What were the issues?
Whether the CPC erred in processing the return under the new tax regime when the assessee had opted for the old regime and not filed the relevant form for the new regime.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
Per Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against CIT(A)’s order vide DIN & Order No: ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1073444239(1) dated 19.02.2025.
The assessee filed return of income on 09.10.2023 declaring income of Rs.2,94,32,200/- under the old regime and not opted the option under section 115BA / 115BAA/115BAB of the Act in the specified column it was mentioned ‘No’. While processing the return under section 143(1) of the Act, it was mentioned as ‘Yes’ and no deduction/benefits under old tax regime was allowed to the assessee as claimed in the ITR. In the case of the assessee for Assessment Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 while filing the return assessee had mentioned as ‘No’ i.e., not opting new regime and it was accepted by the CPC and processed as per the old regime. However, this year in spite of opting old regime, the CPC has considered the return of the assessee under the new regime and raised demand of Rs.9,82,480/-. Assessee has not filed Form 10IC i.e., opting for the scheme under section 115BAA of the Act. Therefore, considering the facts of the case and in the interest of justice and grounds of appeal taken by the assessee, we are remitting this issue back to the JAO for consideration and give benefit under old tax regime as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act after examination/verification of the claims made by the assessee after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee and assessee is directed to substantiate its claim with cogent documents.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 115BAA
- Doms Industries Ltd, Valsad vs PCIT, ValsadITA 595/SRT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ceat Limited, Mumbai vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 8146/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Triveni Interchem Private Limited, Vapi vs DCIT, Valsad Circle, ValsadITA 1199/SRT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Tirthnkar Financial Services Private… vs ITO Ward 4(3)(1), MumbaiITA 2982/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Falcon Bus Lines Private Limited, Mumbai vs DCIT 5(1)(1), MumbaiITA 7271/MUM/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026