SHRI BILURU GURUBASAVA SAHAKARI PATTINA SANGH NIYAMIT,BAGALKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BAGALKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest earned on surplus funds, not immediately required for business operations and invested with the primary intention of earning interest, is not attributable to the core business activities of providing credit facilities. Therefore, such interest income is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest income earned on investments made from surplus funds. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this deduction, treating the interest as 'income from other sources'. The CIT(A)/NFAC upheld the AO's decision.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a co-operative society on surplus funds invested in banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) as business income, or is taxable as income from other sources.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
- Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT999 citing123 Taxmann.com 161 · 2021 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC both dated 16.01.2025 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1072236566(1) for the AY 2020-21 & vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1072237006(1) for the AY 2022-23 passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) for the assessment year 2018-19. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No.417/Bang/2025 for the AY 2020-21:
That the order of the learned Commissioner of Inc
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026