M/S. MAGNET FOUNDRY SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn due to the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against the order of the CIT(A). The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal as it had been settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed before the ITAT can be withdrawn if the underlying tax dispute has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, HON’BLE & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, HON’BLE
PER SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT :
The present appeal is directed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -17, Kolkata, (hereinafter the “ld. CIT(A)”) dt. 12/04/2017, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act’), for Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. In this case, the assessee has filed an application seeking withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the appeal has been settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee has duly filed the copy of the certificate in Form 5 for full and final settlement of tax arrear under Section 5(2) r.w.s. 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. 3. Keeping in view these facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that the assessee has duly complied with the necessary requirements under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, permission as sought by the assessee is granted and this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the Court on 16th December, 2022 at Kolkata. (GIRISH AGRAWAL) VICE-PRESIDENT Kolkata, Dated 16/12/2022 *SC SrPs Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/s. Magnet Foundry Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. 2
आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ" / The Appellant
""यथ" / The Respondent 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु" / Concerned Pr. CIT 4. आयकर आयु" अपील ( ) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय "ितिनिध अिधकरण अपीलीय आयकर कोलकाता/DR,ITAT, Kolkata, , , 6. गाड" फाईल /Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
More judgments on Section 5(2)
- Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Jaipur vs Kavita Khanwani, BeawarITA 867/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT Circle-3(1)(1), International… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1908/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1514/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle 3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1513/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1508/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026