K.M.PRAVEN,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 5(4), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme and paid the dues. Since the respondent did not oppose the submissions, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 for settlement of disputed tax. All taxes due were paid, and the necessary forms were filed, awaiting the final form from the Designated Authority.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal
O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Chennai dated 21.06.2018 relevant to the assessment year 2015-16.
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, by filing Form No. 1 to Form No. 4 towards opting to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 for settlement of disputed tax, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that all taxes due are paid and Form No. 5 is yet to be issued by the Designated Authority and prayed that the appeal filed by the assessee may be deemed to be withdrawn against which the ld. DR has not opposed to the submissions of the learned Counsel.
We have heard both the sides, and perused the materials available on record. In this case, the assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and filed Form No. 1 to Form No.
It was the submissions of the ld. Counsel that all taxes due are paid and Form No. 5 is yet to be issued by the Designated Authority. The ld. DR has also fairly conceded the above submissions of the ld. Counsel. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is open to the assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any prejudice caused in respect of the settlement of tax dispute under the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026