INFINITY ESERVICES P.LTD,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD-12(2), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request for withdrawal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the dispute is not resolved under the scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal as they opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee after opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, and the implications of such withdrawal on the pending appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP :
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-4, New Delhi, dated 28.03.2018.
The learned counsel for assessee, vide its letter dated 16.01.2021, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the 2 ITA.4133/Del/2018 assessment year under consideration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (in short ‘the Act’) and requested for withdrawal of the said appeal
Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed
However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforesaid Act, the appellant (i.e. assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The respondent (i.e. the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.
Above decision was announced in the presence of both the sides on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 20th January, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026