← Back to search

L & W CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TA, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BENGALURU

PDF
ITA 1462/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 November 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, BANGALORE

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEYAssessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar S.V, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Balusamy N, JCIT
Hearing: 03.11.2025Pronounced: 28.11.2025

PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the NFAC, Delhi vide order dated 28/04/2025 in DIN No. ITBA/NFAC/
S/250/2025-26/1075840032(1) for the assessment year 2020-21. 2. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee before us fairly admitted that the assessee failed to make necessary compliances in the proceedings carried out before the AO as well as before the ld. CIT(A).
It was submitted by the ld. AR that the assessee was subject to search and, therefore, he could not respond to the notices issued by the Page 2 of 3

.
revenue authorities for the year under consideration. The ld. AR before us has undertaken the responsibility for making the necessary compliances before the AO and accordingly, the ld. AR requested to set aside the issue to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication as per the provision of law.

3.

On the other hand, the ld. DR vehemently submitted that the assessee has already been provided sufficient opportunities by the revenue authorities to represent its case but assessee failed to avail the same. However, the ld. DR left the issue at the discretion of the Bench.

4.

We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the materials on record. Considering the undertaken given by the ld. Counsel for the assessee, we, in the interest of justice and fair play, are inclined to grant one more opportunity to the assessee to represent the case before the AO. It is needless to mention that the assessee shall co-operate during the proceedings and avoid unwarranted adjournment. Hence, the ground of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in court on 28th day of November, 2025 (KESHAV DUBEY) Accountant Member Bangalore Dated, 28th November, 2025

/ vms /
Page 3 of 3

.
Copy to:

1.

The Applicant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT(A) 5. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 6. Guard file

By order

Asst.

L & W CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TA, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BENGALURU | BharatTax