← Back to search

SHABANA BANU,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(2)(3), BANGALORE

PDF
ITA 1525/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 December 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEYAssessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Sri Kashinath Kalamth, A.R.
For Respondent: Sri Subramanian, D.R.
Hearing: 11.12.2025Pronounced: 12.12.2025

PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 12.11.2024 vide DIN &
Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1070290998(1) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. During the course of hearing, the ld. A.R. of the assessee filed a memo stating that for the reason stated in accompanied application for withdrawal of the appeal, the counsel of the assessee seek permission for withdrawal of the appeal. Further, the Counsel also drew our attention to the memo for withdrawal of appeal dated 11-
12-2025 of the assessee stating the reasons for the request of the Shabana Banu, Bengaluru
Page 2 of 3
withdrawal of the appeal, which is reproduced below for ease of reference and convenience:
Shabana Banu, Bengaluru
Page 3 of 3

3.

Therefore, at the request of the ld. A.R. of the assessee as well as the memo for withdrawal of appeal filed as above by the assessee, we permit the assessee to withdraw her appeal and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 12th Dec, 2025 (Prashant Maharishi)
Vice President (Keshav Dubey)
Judicial Member

Bangalore,
Dated 12th Dec, 2025. VG/SPS

Copy to:

1.

The Applicant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 5 Guard file

By order

Asst.

SHABANA BANU,BANGALORE vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(2)(3), BANGALORE | BharatTax