DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. POSH SEMCO PTE LTD., SINGAPORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had availed the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and a certificate was issued. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue is deemed to have been withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel for AY 2012-13. The assessee subsequently filed a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is to be treated as withdrawn in light of the assessee opting for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLASHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J. M.
This appeal is filed by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation, Circle 2(2)(2), New Delhi, against directions of the ld. Dispute Resolution Panel-2, for Assessment Year 2012-13 wherein the ld. Assessing Officer incorporated such direction in assessment order dated 21.12.2015 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
At the time of hearing the ld. AR submitted that it has filed a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and Form No. 3 has also been issued by the DA on 28th December, 2020. 3. The ld. DR submitted that in that case the appeal is deemed to have been withdrawn. 4. We have carefully considered the relevant certificate issued in Form No. 3 dated 28th December, 2020 under Section 5(1) of the Direct Taxes Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. In view of this the appeal filed by the Revenue is deemed to have been withdrawn. Page | 1
In the result, appeal of the ld. AO is treated as withdrawn and dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on : 27/01/2021.
More judgments on Section 144C(1)
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026