M/S. MAKINO AUTO INDUSTRIES,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, NEW DELHI

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘G’: NEW DELHI (Through Video Conferencing) BEFORE, SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No.2296/Del/2016 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12) M/s Makino Auto Jt. CIT, Industries, Range-35, 577-A/3, Sambhu Nath New Delhi. Compound, Gali No.8, Vs. Friends Colony, G.T. Road, Shahdara, Delhi-95. PAN –AAAFM 7179C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Appellant By None Respondent by Sh. Prakash Dubey, Sr. DR 28.01.2021 Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement 28.01.2021

ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM:

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against order

dated 03.02.2016 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income

Tax (Appeals)-19, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year 2011-12.

2 ITA No.2296/Del/2016 Makino Auto Industries vs. JCIT

2.0 The Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) submits that the

assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears

for the assessment year under consideration under The Direct Tax

Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. It has been stated that the necessary

declaration in accordance with Section 4 of The Direct Tax Vivad se

Vishwas Act, 2020 has been filed by the assessee. The Ld. AR has

prayed for withdrawal of the appeal. It has been submitted that

From-III has been received.

3.0 Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is

consigned to the records and treated as dismissed.

4.0 In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to the

records and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual

Hearing on 28th January, 2021.

Sd/- Sd/- (DR.B.R.R. KUMAR) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 28/01/2021 PK/Ps

3 ITA No.2296/Del/2016 Makino Auto Industries vs. JCIT