No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1046/JP/2017
per the order sheet dated 11-05-2010 (PBP 30-31). All these facts
shows that the earlier agreement of June 2009 was for the different
ITA No.1046/JP/2017 Shri Johari Lal Sodhani vs DCIT, Central Circle-2, Jaipur portion of the land. The agreement of June 2009 was of that portion of
the land on which there was an existing house whereas the subsequent
agreement of 15-01-2010 was for the vacant portion of the land on a
portion of which there was an encumbrance by way of registered
agreement entered by Shri Rajeev Ratan Shukla with Smt. Kamla Devi
Ghiya. In these facts, the rate as per the agreement of June 2009
cannot be applied to the land purchased by the assessee in pursuance
to agreement dated 15-01-2010. It is also noted that no material was
brought on record by the lower authorities to establish that assessee
had paid any amount over and above that recorded in the registered
sale deed dated 12-05-2010 (PBP 43-51). The AO had made the
addition u/s 69 of the Act. As per this section, addition can be made
by the AO where the assessee offers no explanation about the nature/
source of investment or the explanation offered by him is not
satisfactory. However, in the present case, as discussed above,
explanation furnished by the assessee is satisfactory and the AO has
not brought any material on record to disprove the explanation given
by the assessee. The cases (supra) relied on by the ld.AR of the
assessee are squarely applicable and therefore, the addition made by
the AO cannot be sustained. In view of the above facts, circumstances
ITA No.1046/JP/2017 Shri Johari Lal Sodhani vs DCIT, Central Circle-2, Jaipur of the case and the judgements (supra), we do not concur with the findings of the ld. CIT(A). Thus the appeal of the assessee is allowed. 3.0 In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 20 -07-2018.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼ fot; iky jko ½ ¼HkkxpUn½ (Vijay Pal Rao) (Bhagchand) U;kf;d lnL; /Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member
Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 20 /07/ 2018 *Mishra आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेषित@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Shri Johari Lal Sodhani, Jaipur izR;FkhZ@The Respondent- The DCIT, Central Circle-2, Jaipur 2. 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@ CIT(A). vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT, 4. 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No.1046 /JP/2017 ) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order, सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत