No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI (Through Video Conferencing) BEFORE, SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A.N.MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.6440/Del/2017 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13)
Parmod Kumar Saluja Dy. CIT, H.No.874, Sector-14, Circle-3, Gurgaon- 122 001 Gurgaon. Haryana. Vs. PAN –ADZPS 3987J (Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant By None Respondent by Sh. Atigu Ahmed, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 22.02.2021 Date of Pronouncement 22.02.2021
ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM: This appeal is preferred by the assessee against order
dated 21.08.2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals)-1, Gurgaon {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year 2012-13.
2 ITA No.6440/Del/2017 Parmod Kumar Saluja vs. DCIT
2.0 The Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) submits that the
assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears
for the assessment year under consideration under The Direct Tax
Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. It has been stated that the necessary
declaration in accordance with Section 4 of The Direct Tax Vivad se
Vishwas Act, 2020 has been filed by the assessee. The Ld. AR has
prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.
3.0 Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal
is consigned to the records and treated as dismissed.
4.0 In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to the
records and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 22nd February, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (A.N.MISSHRA) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated:22/02/2021 PK/Ps
3 ITA No.6440/Del/2017 Parmod Kumar Saluja vs. DCIT