THE AMRITSAR DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD,AMRITSAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- IV, AMRITSAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the CIT(A) should have decided the appeal on merits even in the absence of the assessee. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter back for adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) for non-prosecution as the assessee failed to appear on multiple hearing dates. The assessee then filed an appeal before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without deciding on merits. Whether the matter should be restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh hearing on merits.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhry
Per N. S. Saini, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-2, Amritsar dated 31.08.2017.
The assessee has filed adjournment application for adjournment of hearing which was rejected by the Bench. The Bench was of the view that the appeal of the assessee can be disposed off in the absence of the assessee, considering the submission of the ld. DR. Therefore, the appeal was heard ex- parte qua the assessee and disposed off on the basis of materials available on record.
It is observed from the order of the CIT(A) that the appeal was fixed for hearing on 16.02.2017, 08.03.2017, 16.03.2018, 21.03.2017, 20.07.2017, 31.07.2017 and 31.08.2017 when the
ITA No. 714/Asr./2017 2 Amritsar district Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd. assessee did not present itself for hearing. Therefore, he dismissed the appeal of the assessee for want of prosecution.
When the Bench inquired from the DR that whether he has any objection to restore the matter back to the file of the CIT(A) for adjudicating the appeal of the assessee on merits, the Ld. DR submitted that he had no objection to the same.
After hearing the Ld. DR and perusing the materials available on record, we find that in the instant case, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) as the assessee failed to appear before him on the various dates fixed by him. In our considered opinion, even if the assessee fails to appear before the CIT(A), the CIT(A) has to decide the appeal of the assessee on merit on the basis of materials available on record so that the assessee can meet its case in appeal before higher forum. Therefore, we are of the considered view that the matter should be restored back to the file of the CIT(A) for adjudicating the appeal of the assessee on merit to which the DR has no objection. Hence, we set aside the order of the CIT(A) and remand the matter back to file of the CIT(A) to adjudicate the appeal of the assessee on merit after allowing reasonable and proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. (Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 20/02/2019)
Sd/- Sd/- (N. K. Choudhry) (N. S. Saini) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 20/02/2019 *Subodh*
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026