M/S GURU RAM DASS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FEROZPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXAMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemptions) erred by not providing the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to be heard before rejecting the application. The Tribunal found that the rejection was based on grounds where the appellant was not given a proper chance to clarify or rebut the issues raised.
What were the facts?
The appellant society applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application citing reasons such as the society's switch from Section 10(23C) to 12AA, misrepresentation regarding the purchase of a luxury vehicle, and insufficient evidence of charitable activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) followed the principles of natural justice by providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard before rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: SH. N.S.SAINI & SH. N.K.CHOUDHRY
PER N.K.CHOUDHRY, JM:
The instant appeal has been preferred by the Appellant against the order dated 30.06.2017 passed by the Ld. CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as ‘the Act’).
An application u/s 12A of the Act was filed by the appellant society on dated 21.12.2016 before the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh by disclosing the fact that the society is an ongoing entity and is in operation since 18.11.1997. The appellant also disclosed its aims and objects to establish, takeover and ITA No.546 /Asr/2017 2 run authorized study centre from various recognized Uni
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026