ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTA vs. M/S N R SWITCH - -RADIO, KOTA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary limit. The exception claimed by the Revenue regarding the circular not being followed was not applicable as the CIT(A) had decided the issue based on High Court decisions, not by deeming the circular illegal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D by the Assessing Officer. The tax effect of the appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable given the tax effect is below the CBDT circular limit, and if the exception for non-compliance with the circular applies.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM :
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 23rd May,
2018 of ld. CIT (A), Kota for the assessment year 2014-15. The revenue has
raised the following grounds :-
“ On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT (A) has erred in :-
(i) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 7734/- made by the AO u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D.
(ii) The appellant craves liberty to raise additional ground and to modify/amend the ground of appeal at the time of hearing.
2 ITA No. 951/JP/2018 M/s. N.R. Switch N Radio Service Pvt. Ltd., Kota.
The issue falls under exception as mentioned in para 10(b) of Board’s Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018.”
We have heard the ld. D/R as well as the ld. A/R and carefully perused the
impugned order of ld. CIT (A). As apparent from the ground no. 1 of the revenue’s
appeal that the tax effect in this appeal is not exceeding Rs. 20 lacs and, therefore,
the monetary limit provided under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018
renders the appeal filed by the department not maintainable. The ld. D/R has
submitted that the issue of disallowance made by the AO under section 14A read
with Rule 8D which was deleted by the ld. CIT (A) without following the Circular No.
5/2014. Hence the case falls in the exception provided in para 10(b) of the Circular.
We note that the ld. CIT (A) has deleted the disallowance made by the AO on the
ground that the assessee has not earned any exempt income and, therefore,
following the various decisions on this issue, no disallowance can be made under
section 14A. Thus it is clear that the ld. CIT (A) has not given the finding on the
issue by holding that the Circular issued by the CBDT is illegal or ultra virus but the
issue has been decided by following the decisions of Hon’ble High Courts. Hence
when no issue is involved in this case where the CBDT circular is either held illegal or
ultra virus, then the case would not fall in the exception under para 10(b) of the
Circular No. 3/2018 as claimed by the revenue. Accordingly when the tax effect in
the appeal of the revenue is below the limit set out by CBDT for the appeal, the appeal of
the assessee is not maintainable in view of CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018. Accordingly the appeal of the Department is dismissed as not maintainable.
3 ITA No. 951/JP/2018 M/s. N.R. Switch N Radio Service Pvt. Ltd., Kota.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 12/10/2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (foØe flag ;kno) (fot; iky jkWo ½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV ) (VIJAY PAL RAO) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member
Jaipur Dated:- 12/10/2018. Das/
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेषित@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू
The Appellant- The ACIT, Circle-1, Kota 2. The Respondent – M/s. N.R. Switch N Radio Service P. Ltd., Kota. 3. The CIT(A). 4. The CIT, 5. The DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. Guard File (ITA No. 951/JP/2018) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत
4 ITA No. 951/JP/2018 M/s. N.R. Switch N Radio Service Pvt. Ltd., Kota.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026