MRS. SUMITRA DEVI,JHUNJHUNU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JHUNJHUNU

PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM :

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 23RD March,

2018 of ld. CIT (A)-3, Jaipur for the assessment year 2009-10. None has appeared

on behalf of the assessee when this appeal was called for hearing repeatedly. It transpires from the record that on the last date of hearing on 20th August, 2018 the

assessee filed an application for adjournment and consequently the hearing of the

matter was fixed for today i.e. 15.10.2018. A notice was also issued to the assessee

through Registered A/D. Despite the fact that the assessee took adjournment on

the last date of hearing and was also issued notice to the assessee, nobody has

appeared on behalf of the assessee. Accordingly, we are satisfied that the assessee

is not interested in prosecution of the present appeal. In these circumstances,

2 ITA No. 673/JP/2018 Mrs. Sumitra Devi, Jhunjhunu.

following the decision of Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India

(P) Ltd., (1991) 38 ITD 320 and also on the judgment of the Hon’ble M.P. High

Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukhoji Rao Holkar vs. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480

(MP), we dismiss the appeal of the assessee for want of prosecution.

Order is pronounced in the open court on 15/10/2018.

Sd/- Sd/- (foØe flag ;kno) (fot; iky jkWo ½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV ) (VIJAY PAL RAO) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member

Jaipur Dated:- 15/10/2018. Das/

आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेषित@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू

सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत

3 ITA No. 673/JP/2018 Mrs. Sumitra Devi, Jhunjhunu.