M/S SHAHEED UDHAM SINGH EDUCATYIONAL SOCIETY,MOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the commission receipts, being in the nature of business and subject to TDS under Section 194H, were not eligible for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad). The assessee's activities were considered to be in the nature of business with a profit motive, not solely for educational purposes.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an educational society, claimed exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) for its income. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the case due to cash deposits and found that receipts from Punjab Technical University (PTU) were in the nature of commission subject to TDS under Section 194H, deeming them business income not eligible for exemption. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the AO's decision.
What were the issues?
Whether commission receipts from PTU, subject to TDS, are eligible for exemption as educational income under Section 10(23C)(iiiad). Whether the assessee society's activities were solely for educational purposes to qualify for exemption.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Camp Bench at Jalandhar
Before: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Ravish Sood
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM The present appeal filed by the assessee society for A.Y. 2011-12 is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-4, Ludhiana, dated 31.08.2016, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Sec. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘IT Act’), dated 03.03.2015. The assessee assailing the order of the CIT(A) has raised before us the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The order passed u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Ludhiana is aga
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194H
- Mahesh Pulaveni, Adilabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 991/HYD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026