SMITA JAIN,SAMBHAL vs. DCIT CIRCLE-I, MORADABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee had appealed an order from the CIT(A). Subsequently, the assessee opted to settle the tax arrears for the assessment year under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee requested withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY
ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP : This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2017-18 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-43, New Delhi dated 27th June, 2019.
2 ITA-6994/Del/2019
The assessee, vide letter dated 27th January, 2021 has intimated the 2. Tribunal that she has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (in short ‘the Act’) and requested for withdrawal of the said appeal.
Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.
Above decision was announced in the presence of both the sides on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 10th February, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026