ITO WARD 16 (2) vs. THREE DEE EXIM (P) LTD,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that upon filing the declaration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, any pending appeal before the Tribunal is deemed to have been withdrawn. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal and the assessee filed a cross-objection against an order for AY 1999-2000. The assessee subsequently settled the matter under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal pending before the ITAT is deemed withdrawn upon the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI O.P. KANT & MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
ORDER PER O.P. KANT, AM:
The present appeal by Revenue and the Cross Objection by assessee are directed against order dated 02.08.2007 passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XIX, New Delhi, pertaining to assessment year 1999-2000.
The learned counsel for the assessee, at the outset, stated that the assessee has settled the matter under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. He, therefore, seeks permission to treat the appeal as deemed to be withdrawn under the provisions of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee has also filed a copy of Form No. 3 issued by the respective Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, which is placed on file.
We have heard learned Representative of both the parties through Video Conferencing and have perused Form No. 3 issued by Income-tax Department with reference to present appeal. For ready reference, Section 4(2) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act (supra) reads as under: “4. (1) ………………………. (2) Upon the filing the declaration, any appeal pending before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal or Commissioner (Appeals), in respect of the disputed income or disputed interest or disputed penalty or disputed fee and tax arrear shall be deemed to have been withdrawn from the date on which certificate under sub-section (1) of section 5 is issued by the designated authority.”
In view of the above, as the Form No. 3 has been issued in the case of the assessee, the appeal of the Revenue is deemed to be withdrawn. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Apropos the Cross Objection of the assessee, since the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed under the provisions of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the purpose of Cross Objection has become infructuous, accordingly, the same is dismissed as such.
In result, the appeal of Revenue and the Cross Objection of the assessee are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court.
More judgments on Section 4(2)
- M/S. Gladiator Commodities Pvt. Ltd… vs DCIT, Central Circle-4(1), Kolkata, IndiaITA 1050/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Smt. Reeta Dubey, Jaunpur vs Income Tax Officer - II, JaunpurITA 128/VNS/2025[2012-2013]Status: Disposed23 Jul 2026AY 2012-2013
- Ashwani Sood, Patiala vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - Nabha, NabhaITA 801/CHANDI/2025[2009-10]Status: Disposed16 Apr 2026AY 2009-10
- Rasar Biogenetics, Hyderabad vs ITO., Ward-10(1), HyderabadITA 1266/HYD/2025[2016-2017]Status: Disposed7 Jan 2026AY 2016-2017
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026