ACIT, CIRCLE-9(1), NEW DELHI vs. FLEUR HOTELS P.LTD, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 7813/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 February 2021AY 2014-153 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the tax effect of the appeal was below the minimum threshold for filing appeals as per CBDT circulars. The Revenue's representative agreed that the appeal was not maintainable and did not press the appeal.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal against the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer concerning disallowance under Section 14A and MAT liability. The tax effect of the appeal was below the revised monetary limit set by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable given the tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit by CBDT circulars.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A,Section 115JB,Section 254(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

(A) This appeal by Revenue is filed against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 3, New Delhi, [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 24.09.2018 for Assessment Year 2014-15. Grounds taken in this appeal of Revenue are as under:

“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 89,90,268/- made by the Assessing Officer while passing assessment order dated 23.12.2016 on account of disallowance under section 14A r.w. rule 8D of the Act. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well in the law, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in deleting addition of Rs. 94,41,125/- made by AO

ITA No.- 7813/Del/2018 Fleur Hotels P. Ltd. New Delhi u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act while computing the MAT liability under the provisions u/s 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. The appellant craves leave, modify, add or forego any grounds of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of this appeal.”

(B) At the outset, it was noticed by us at the time of hearing that total tax effect reported at Sl. No. 10 in Form 36 of the appeal filed by Revenue is Rs. 29,16,892/-; which is well below Rs. 50,00,000/-. Vide recent CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with earlier CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, minimum threshold limit of tax effect for filing of appeals by Revenue in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”, for short) has been enhanced to Rs. 50,00,000/-. In a subsequent clarification issued by CBDT vide F.No. 279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ, dated 20/08/2019, it has been clarified by CBDT that the aforesaid revised monetary limit is also applicable to all pending appeals in ITAT. In view of the foregoing, Learned Senior Departmental Representative agreed that this appeal was not maintainable; and to this contention did not press the appeal. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed being not pressed, and also being not maintainable having regard to aforesaid CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with aforesaid CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 in the light of aforesaid clarification dated 20/08/2019.

(C) Before leaving, we clarify that Revenue will be at liberty to approach Income Tax Appellate Tribunal U/s 254(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking recall of this order and, for restoration of this appeal if it is found that appeal

ITA No.- 7813/Del/2018 Fleur Hotels P. Ltd. New Delhi of Revenue is not covered by aforesaid CBDT Circulars dated 08.08.2019 and 11.07.2018.

(D) In the result, this appeal by Revenue is dismissed. Our decision was orally pronounced in the Open Court after conclusion of hearing on 16.02.2021.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →