KM SHAJIDHABANU,METTUPALAYAM vs. PCIT, COIMBATORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's counsel filed a petition to withdraw the appeal. The CIT-DR did not object to the withdrawal. Therefore, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against a revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263. The original assessment was framed under Section 143(3).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed against a revision order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGHAND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA
O R D E R
PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the Revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore-1 u/s.263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) vide Revision No.PCIT, Coimbatore-1/Revision-263/100000185572/2021 dated 10.03.2021. The assessment was framed by the Assessing Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 3(1), Coimbatore for the assessment year 2016-17 u/s.143(3) of the Act vide order dated 19.12.2018.
At the outset, the ld.counsel for the assessee stated that he has filed petition dated 12.11.2022 for withdrawal of this appeal, which reads as under:- “With ref. to the above and as instructed by the appellant, I am to submit that the above appeal may be treated as withdrawn. Any inconvenience caused in this connection is regretted. Vakkalath has already been filed.”
When this was pointed out to ld. CIT-DR, he has not raised any objection for withdrawal of appeal. Hence, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 16th November, 2022 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026