SABARI FOUNDATION P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO CORPORATE WARD 6(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of Rs. 1 crore to allow the assessee to reconcile the amount. The AO will decide on the disallowance based on the facts presented by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) made a disallowance of Rs. 1 crore under Section 41(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, treating an advance received from Sri Ramakrishna Raja as a cessation of liability. The assessee contended that this amount was disputed and requested an opportunity to reconcile it.
What were the issues?
Whether an advance received can be treated as a cessation of liability for disallowance under Section 41(1)(a) when the assessee seeks to reconcile the amount.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGHAND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA
आदेश /O R D E R
PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, Chennai in dated 31.01.2018. The assessment was framed by the Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 6(1), Chennai
2013-14 u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) vide order dated 31.03.2016.
The only issue in this appeal of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the action of the AO in making disallowance u/s.41(1)(a) of the Act and that also to the extent of Rs.1 crore, which is not reconciled on account of Sri Ramakrishna Raja.
Brief facts relating to this short issue are that the AO made disallowance u/s.41(1)(a) of the Act on the ground that advance received from Sri Ramakrishna Raja amounting to Rs.3.96 crores is cessation of liability and assessee has not reconciled the amount to the extent of Rs.1 crore. The ld.counsel stated that this amount of Rs.1 crore is only disputed by assessee now. He requested that for reconciliation purpose, the matter can be referred back to the file of the AO and in case, the assessee is able to reconcile this amount of Rs.1 crore as noted by CIT(A) in para 6.5.3 at page 18 of his order in tabular form at item 4, the same can be adjudicated and decided accordingly. To this proposition, the ld. Senior DR has not raised any objection.
After hearing rival contentions and going through the facts of the case, we set aside this amount of Rs.1 crore disallowed by AO u/s.41(1)(a) of the Act, so that the assessee can reconcile and whether this is to be disallowed or not, the AO will decide based on the facts of the case. Accordingly, this issue of assessee’s appeal is set aside to the file of the AO and allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 18th November, 2022 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 41(1)(a)
- Anil Bansal H.U.F., Delhi vs ITO Ward 51(1), DelhiITA 1276/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 May 2026AY 2018-19
- Raghib Ali, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer 44(2), KolkataITA 966/KOL/2024[2021-2022]Status: Disposed21 Jul 2025AY 2021-2022
- DCIT 42 1 1, Mumbai vs Pratap Uttam Purohit, MumbaiITA 2042/MUM/2025[2014]Status: Disposed16 Jun 2025
- R.L.Traders, Delhi vs ACIT, Central Circle-17, New DelhiITA 3634/DEL/2024[2008-09]Status: Disposed6 Jun 2025AY 2008-09
- Star Paper Mills Ltd., Kolkata vs D.C.I.T., Circle - 4(1), KolkataITA 2571/KOL/2024[2023-2024]Status: Disposed8 May 2025AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026