TARANNUM AMMER,MORADABAD vs. ITO 17(1)(1), MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRYAssessment Year: 2014-15
Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 22.02.2024, impugned herein, passed by the National
Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC)/ Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) (in short Ld. Commissioner) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2014-15. 2. The Assessee intends to settle the dispute amicably through
Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and therefore has already filed
Form No.1 and waiting for determination of the due amount and undertakes to deposit the same within the due date to be prescribed by the Revenue Authority.
Shri Tarannum Aamer
2
3. The Ld. D.R. also acknowledged the aforesaid facts of filing form No.1. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to both the parties to seek recall of this order, in case of not settling the dispute finally and/or non-depositing the amount by the Assessee with the prescribed time, as to be determined by the authorities.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as mentioned above.
Order pronounced in the open court on 10.01.2025. (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
* Kishore, Sr. P.S.
Copy to: The Appellant
The Respondent
The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai
The DR Concerned Bench
////
By Order
Dy/Asstt.