STANDING CONFERENCE OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES (SCOPE),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that Form No. 3 under the Vivad se Vishwas Act had been issued, confirming the settlement of the dispute. Consequently, the appeal was treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order. During the hearing, the assessee submitted a letter stating that the dispute was settled under the Direct Taxes Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, and requested the appeal be treated as withdrawn.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
Assessee by : Ms. Shivani Kataria, Ca Revenue by: Shri Prakash Dubey, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 02/03/2021 Date of pronouncement 02/03/2021 O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A)-18, New Delhi dated 16.10.2015 for the Assessment Year 2011-12.
At the time of hearing of the appeal a letter was placed on record dated 27.02.2021, wherein, the counsel of the assessee has mentioned that the assessee has obtained Form No. 3 dated 31.01.2021 under Sub-section (1) of Section 5 of Direct Taxes Vivaad and Vishwas Act, 2020, wherein, the dispute involved in this appeal has been settled. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee may be treated as withdrawn.
The ld DR also conquered with the above statement.
In view of the above facts that Form No. 3 under the provisions of Section 5 of Direct Taxes Vivaad and Vishwas Act, 2020 dated 31.01.2021 has already been issues to the assessee where there is a refund due to the assessee, thus, assessee’s dispute is settled involved in this appeal.
More judgments on Section 5
- Sarmistha Dey, Hooghly, West Bengal vs Income Tax Officer Ward 24(1), Hoogly…ITA 2864/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Sarmistha Dey, Hooghly, West Bengal vs Income Tax Officer Ward 24(1), Hoogly…ITA 2863/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Jiban Kumar Saha, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2851/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Jiban Kumar Saha, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2850/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Subhasish Bhattacharya, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2849/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026