SATBIR JAIN HUF,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 43(5), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 720/DEL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 March 2021AY 2011-122 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH D: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY

For Appellant: Mr. Manoj Kumar, CA
Hearing: 17.03.2021Pronounced: 17.03.2021

ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP :

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-15, New Delhi, dated 06.12.2019.

2.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter, received through email, dated 13.03.2021, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to 2 ITA-720/Del/2019 the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was pronounced in the open court in the presence of both the parties on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 17th March, 2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →