Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH D: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D: NEW DELHI (Through Video Conferencing)
BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.720/Del/2020 Assessment Year : 2011-12
Satbir Jain HUF, Vs. Income Tax Officer, A-25, Rama Road, Ward-19(1), Adarsh Nagar, New Delhi Delhi-110033 PAN-AATHS3179P
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by : Mr. Manoj Kumar, CA Respondent by : Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Date of hearing : 17.03.2021 Date of pronouncement : 17.03.2021
ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP :
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed
against the order of learned CIT(A)-15, New Delhi, dated 06.12.2019.
The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter, received through
email, dated 13.03.2021, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by
him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to
2 ITA-720/Del/2019
the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad
Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for
withdrawal of the appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was pronounced in the open court in the presence of
both the parties on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 17th March, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/-
(K. NARASIMHA CHARY) (G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT f{x~{tÜ Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT By Order
Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi